Comments on: OpenOffice.org vs Firefox http://www.skunkworks.ro/2007/06/openofficeorg-vs-firefox/ Master of many trades. Solutions for your IT related problems. Fri, 01 Jan 2010 14:16:29 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v= By: ad http://www.skunkworks.ro/2007/06/openofficeorg-vs-firefox/#comment-140 ad Thu, 13 Sep 2007 04:21:10 +0000 http://89.34.203.86:80/wordpress/?p=30#comment-140 See that: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/12/firefox_google_marriage_threatened_by_adblock_plus/ See that:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/09/12/firefox_google_marriage_threatened_by_adblock_plus/

]]> By: ad http://www.skunkworks.ro/2007/06/openofficeorg-vs-firefox/#comment-139 ad Thu, 19 Jul 2007 17:13:29 +0000 http://89.34.203.86:80/wordpress/?p=30#comment-139 I agree with you. Open Office is quite a pain to use. It is way to slow. There are multiple issues with conversion of files. If you really need an Office type of software, it may be less expensive to actually buy MS Office (if you pay US salary). Starting OO over would be probably a good idea. It might be some kind of mix of a stand alone application and online 'Google Documents' type of software. What about free 'home edition lite' with add-ons for advanced users that could require payments? Last but not least, OO will not be popular as long as it is way inferior to MS Office. I agree with you.
Open Office is quite a pain to use. It is way to slow. There are multiple issues with conversion of files.

If you really need an Office type of software, it may be less expensive to actually buy MS Office (if you pay US salary).

Starting OO over would be probably a good idea. It might be some kind of mix of a stand alone application and online ‘Google Documents’ type of software. What about free ‘home edition lite’ with add-ons for advanced users that could require payments?

Last but not least, OO will not be popular as long as it is way inferior to MS Office.

]]>